Glossary
By Arjun Mehta
Agentic engineering intelligence is AI that autonomously understands your codebase, identifies patterns and risks without manual prompting, and surfaces actionable insights directly to engineering leaders and CTOs. It's the difference between a tool that answers questions you ask and a system that proactively identifies problems you didn't know to look for.
The key distinction: reactive systems wait for questions. Agentic systems continuously observe your codebase and volunteer insights. An agentic system is like having a tireless senior architect auditing your entire system 24/7.
Agentic systems operate in a closed loop: ingest codebase, analyze patterns, detect anomalies, surface insights, verify impact. They don't just report facts; they reason about implications. If three teams reimplement the same service, it flags this as architecture debt. If a critical path is owned by one engineer leaving, it alerts immediately.
For CTOs, this is transformative. Instead of learning about bus factors during postmortems, agentic systems identify them during planning. Instead of discovering tightly coupled services during failed deployments, they surface these risks before you merge.
Glue continuously scans your actual codebase and understands ownership, dependencies, and health holistically—then alerts you to architectural risks, documentation gaps, and knowledge silos as they develop.
"This is just monitoring." Not at all. Monitoring tells you when things break. Agentic systems tell you what will break and why. It's the difference between a fire alarm and fire prevention.
"Agentic systems will over-automate and create chaos." The best ones don't execute—they surface findings with confidence scores and let humans decide. Think advisor, not actor. You retain full control.
"We need agentic systems to replace engineers." Backwards. Agentic intelligence frees engineers from tedious codebase archaeology so they can focus on building. It's a multiplier.
Engineering teams spend enormous energy on low-value discovery: "Who owns this?" "Does anyone know why this service times out?" "Which systems would this change impact?" Agentic systems compress discovery time from hours to seconds, giving your team back time to spend on actual engineering.
When your PM asks, "How long will this feature take?" an agentic system tells you exactly which systems are involved, who owns them, what the dependencies are, and what technical debt exists in those areas. That's the foundation of accurate planning.
Discovery time reduction: Track how long it takes to answer "What systems touch this feature?" and "Who owns this component?" You should see 80%+ time savings.
Bus factor improvement: How many of your critical paths have single-engineer ownership? Agentic systems flag these immediately, giving you time to address before crisis.
Incident detection latency: How fast do you discover issues after they're introduced? Agentic systems that monitor continuously can detect anomalies before they cascade.
Estimation confidence: Engineers with full codebase visibility estimate more accurately. Track sprint estimate variance before and after.
Q: How is this different from static analysis tools? Static analysis finds bugs and style issues. Agentic systems understand your entire system architecture: what talks to what, who owns it, how it fails, what the risks are. Much broader scope.
Q: Do we need to modify our codebase for agentic intelligence to work? No. Agentic systems read your code exactly as it is, parse your Git history, and work with any technology stack. Zero code changes needed.
Q: What if the agent's analysis is wrong? Good agentic systems show their reasoning. You can see exactly which code patterns, metrics, and dependencies led to a conclusion. This transparency lets you validate and correct.
Q: How do agentic systems handle rapidly changing codebases? Continuously. They should re-analyze on every commit, not on a schedule. That's how they catch issues early.
Keep reading
